Does anyone on here think evidence was planted?

I want to start off by saying I think OJ is guilty of the murder. I try to keep an open mind about the possibility of SOME evidence being planted to secure a conviction.

I’ll admit, the blood on the gate with the EDTA is strange but in the documentary they were defended it saying it could be from paint on the gate or liquid detergent. But it was also weird that it wasn’t in a photograph taken 2-3 weeks prior to collecting it. Seems fishy to me.

What about the socks? That’s even weirder to me.

If you believe evidence was planted, do you think OJ did commit the murders but the police planted more evidence to ensure they get him locked up?

Do you think a lot of this was just bad police work in collecting evidence?

Curious on your thoughts.