(Government) is firing federal workers who are not funded by taxpayers - Reuters article

Hi everyone. I came on here a little while ago asking if any federal workers who had been fired from roles that were not taxpayer funded, but rather funded be user fees and other private money. A lot of you responded, and I'm hugely grateful, because we put out an article highlighting that firing people who are funded privately achieves nothing when the aim is 'trimming government bulk'

The article is on the front page of Reuters today under the title "(President's surname) is firing federal workers who are not funded by taxpayers" - I'm sorry I could not put the link here but it contains words banned by fednews like the names of the president and his X-owner adviser. https://www.reuters.com/

UPDATE: If you think there is anything else we should be covering, reach out to me at [patrick.wingrove@thomsonreuters.com](mailto:patrick.wingrove@thomsonreuters.com) or on Signal at patrickwingrove.55